翻訳と辞書 ・ Rogers Stirk Harbour + Partners
・ Rogers Sugar
・ Rogers Telecom
・ Rogers Township
・ Rogers Township, Barnes County, North Dakota
・ Rogers Township, Cass County, Minnesota
・ Rogers Township, Ford County, Illinois
・ Rogers Township, Michigan
・ Rogers TV
・ Rogers v. Bellei
・ Rogers v. Grimaldi
・ Rogers v. Koons
・ Rogers v. Lodge
・ Rogers v. Okin
・ Rogers v. Tennessee
・ Rogers v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
・ Rogers Vacuum Tube Company
・ Rogers Wireless
・ Rogers Writers' Trust Fiction Prize
・ Rogers' Hybrids
・ Rogers' Rangers
・ Rogers' Store
・ Rogers, Arkansas
・ Rogers, California
・ Rogers, Kansas
・ Rogers, Kentucky
・ Rogers, Logan County, Kentucky
・ Rogers, Minnesota
・ Rogers, Nebraska
・ Rogers, New Mexico
|
|
| Rogers v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Rogers v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
''Rogers v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.'', 230 F.3d 868 (6th Cir. 2000), was a case decided by the 6th Circuit that held that remand to a state court cannot be achieved after removal to a federal court by lowering the damages sought to fall below the amount in controversy requirement.〔Yeazell, S.C. ''Civil Procedure, Seventh Edition.'' Aspen Publisher, New York, NY: 2008, p. 218〕
==Decision==
The plaintiff sued Wal-Mart in state court for a state law negligence action, seeking $950,000 in damages. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1441, the defendant removed to federal court on the basis of diversity jurisdiction. The plaintiff reduced the damages sought to less than $75,000 and petitioned for remand to state court because the amount in controversy requirement was no longer met. The 6th Circuit upheld a denial of the petition for remand, holding that the amount in controversy at the time of removal was what mattered.〔Yeazell, p. 218〕
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Rogers v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|